Engineering time lost to rework
Engineers revisit code and tests instead of moving on to the next feature.
AI project reviewer for software teams
Sorno continuously reviews your project—from planning to code—to catch gaps and conflicts.
Missing workflows and conflicting requirements can surface after work has started—sending teams back to clarify decisions, redesign flows, and rebuild code.
Engineers revisit code and tests instead of moving on to the next feature.
Teams reopen decisions, revise designs, and repeat testing near launch.
Missing flows and inconsistent behavior can turn into blocked users and support requests.
A recovery flow missed in planning can mean redesigning, rebuilding, and retesting before release.
OUR SOLUTION
Sorno understands your existing product and what your team is building—then continuously checks for gaps and conflicts.
How it works today
Behavior, business rules, workflows, and dependencies.
What your team is building
Goals, requirements, discussions, decisions, designs, and code.
Checks the project against your product—and checks its plans, decisions, designs, and code against each other.
Reviews across your tools
Review the whole project—from planning to code—not just each piece in isolation.
Find missing workflows and undefined behavior—even when nothing in the project contradicts anything else.
| Case | Review result |
|---|---|
| Sign in with a verification code | Covered |
| Lose access to your phone | Recovery flow missing |
| Already signed in when 2FA is enabled | Policy not defined |
Catch conflicting directions across requirements, discussions, and designs before teams build against different assumptions.
Recovery is self-service.
Recovery goes through customer support.
Conflicting recovery policies
Review code against the project’s requirements and decisions to catch behavior that is missing or inconsistent.
Requirement: Both sign-in methods require 2FA.
Google sign-in skips required verification.
Catch conflicting assumptions between projects that depend on the same behavior.
See which flows, systems, and other projects a proposed change could affect.
See what is missing, unresolved, or not yet implemented.
Know what was decided, why, and where it came from.
Talk through a real software project and where the reviewer could help.
Book demo